04 / Strategy comparison
Compare the pathways
Same landscape, same horizon — three strategies side by side. Comparing Atlantic Forest, Brazil at 250 ha over 25 years.
Prototype simulation — values are illustrative and are not site-specific scientific predictions.
Scores are a transparent weighted average of normalised indicators.
Best overall strategy
Mixed restoration
Highest weighted score (0.80) for “Balanced ecosystem recovery” across 3 compared scenarios in Atlantic Forest, Brazil, over a 25-year horizon. Scoring normalises each indicator across the compared set, then applies the objective weights — no hidden model.
| Indicator | A · Active reforestation | B · Passive regeneration | C · Mixed restoration |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cost | $807,500 | $207,500 | $575,000 |
| Tree cover | 92.9% | 74.6% | 89% |
| Carbon sequestered | 34,911 t | 14,743 t | 30,348 t |
| Biodiversity index | 87/100 | 76/100 | 91/100 |
| Water availability | 72% | 61% | 82% |
| Temperature reduction | -2.06°C | -1.27°C | -1.93°C |
| Funded area | 250 ha | 250 ha | 250 ha |
| Weighted score | 0.65 | 0.20 | 0.80 |
Indicator comparison
Projected values at horizon